E-ISSN:2250-0758
P-ISSN:2394-6962

Research Article

Consumer Behavior

International Journal of Engineering and Management Research

2025 Volume 15 Number 1 February
Publisherwww.vandanapublications.com

Determinants of the Social Media Influence on the Consumers’ Travel Decision Making Process

Md. Noor Hossain1, Amit Kundu2*
DOI:10.5281/zenodo.15089386

1 Md. Noor Hossain, Research Scholar, Department of Management Sciences, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Nadia, West Bengal, India.

2* Amit Kundu, Associate Professor, Department of Management, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to ascertain how customers use social media for travel-related decision making at their three stages of the travel namely, pre-travel, during the travel and the post travel decision making.
Design/Methodology/Approach – After analyzing the relevant literature, a quantitative investigation was carried out using structured questionnaire. A questionnaire with identified items in the three stages was used to gather the primary data from the consumers who have used social media for their travel related decision making, and a statistical package was used to analyze the findings.
Findings – A theoretical framework was developed and the developed model was validated by determining the elements influencing social media use for travel-related reasons at the three stages of decision making.
Research Limitations/Implications – The respondents were chosen solely from the state of West Bengal, and the sample was not chosen at random. The study might have a difficulty with generalization, particularly when it comes to marketplaces with significantly distinct cultural traits.
Practical Implications – The study's conclusions might help researchers and industry professionals comprehend social media and Web 2.0 technologies and how they affect customers in their travel related decision making.
Originality/Value – Social media use is one of the main factors influencing consumer behavior and travel marketing in recent years. Understanding these trends and how they affect consumer behavior is crucial because they could affect how travel-related information is distributed and made accessible.

Keywords: Consumer Behavior, Tourism, Social Media, Travel Stages, Decision Making, India

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Amit Kundu, Associate Professor, Department of Management, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
Email:
Md. Noor Hossain, Amit Kundu, Determinants of the Social Media Influence on the Consumers’ Travel Decision Making Process. int. j. eng. mgmt. res.. 2025;15(1):165-177.
Available From
https://ijemr.vandanapublications.com/index.php/j/article/view/1713

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2025-01-03 2025-01-20 2025-02-08
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
None Nil Yes 2.19

© 2025 by Md. Noor Hossain, Amit Kundu and Published by Vandana Publications. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Download PDFBack To Article1. Introduction2. Literature Review3. Research Gaps4. Research Objectives5. Development of the
Theoretical Framework
of the Research
6. Methodology7. Results and Discussion8. Discussions9. Conclusions and
Practical Implications
References

1. Introduction

Human beings today reside in a new age – an age where the horizons between the ‘real’ and ‘virtual’ have converged to an extent that human beings have had to rethink the entire idea of the world they live, thrive and prosper. One very important space of these changing imaginations has been the new space of society that has come up – the social media. The emergence of social media has led to a shift in the paradigm throughout the world with communication channels allowing users to monitor, engage and share information in an unprecedented scale and scope. Although social media is being perceived today in terms of a metaphor of a new society, a scientific enquiry has to accept that at the end of the day, the advent of social media is a technological development initiating a new milieu, having variety of effects across different sectors, awaiting explorations. This work motivates itself from tracing one such effect in a particular sector – Tourism. But before that it seems essential to foreground a nuanced understanding of the social media in the current conjecture. Why is this renewed importance being catered to the social media?

The term "social media" refers to a collection of online applications, which form a part of Web 2.0's revolution. Today's popularization of social media has made radical changes in the culture[1] of common people. The purpose of life somewhere has become contained in the social image people want to keep on their social media profiles, starting with what they're wearing, what they're eating, wherever they're going. One might understand social media in that sense, as a space of showing off and receiving validation, promoting strong cases of snob and bandwagon effects. The evolution of web technologies and Internet developments since Web 1.0 to now Web 2.0 has primarily contributed to this paradigm shift in human culture. However, scholars have also sought to see these changes as method of democratization via technology, so that users are empowered to express their views and ideas through the creation of user-generated content, which can be viewed as an enabling factor. The transition has also been referred to as a social movement. Such is the extant of world views around social media, advocating its importance.

The spread and extant of social media does not just remain constrained in the discursive domains.

Rigorous empirical insights present the extensive use and dependence on social media aiding various forms of decision-makings ranging from which political party to support to which product to buy, in turns making its importance foregrounded in the terrains of marketing and consumer behaviour. According to Duggan et al. (2015), 74 % of Internet users around the world were active on social networking sites by January 2014, with adults accounting for more than half. The vast number of users in their daily lives can be seen on the social media platforms as Okazaki (2009) points out. Worldwide, 50 percent of social media users monitor products on social media, 29 percent monitor movements and find product assessments and material, whereas 20 percent observe to review products (Gallup, 2014). Consumers in these varied ways prefer social media to find out the necessary information about favorite brands through the best values. Social media has become an integral part of the customers and any dissociation with it cannot be imagined.

Having foregrounded the importance of social media in determining the behaviour of the consumers, we now would seek to narrow down to the sector of our concern – tourism. It is already been elaborately posed that social media gives consumers a voice and allows them to connect and share their views and ideas with any consumer in the world (Kozinets et al., 2010) in case of varied sectors, and tourism is no exception. Tourism is one of the largest revenue-generating industries for several countries, reflecting shining prospects. For example, Spain, has been the highest country in the world in terms of tourist arrivals in the last 10 years (UNWTO, 2019). India has also shown enormous prospects in terms of tourism industry. Tourism in India contributes approximately 4.6% to the nation’s GDP, as per the Ministry of Tourism. Despite not being prioritized by the government, the sector plays a vital role in job creation, supporting over 32 million jobs in 2021. The World Travel and Tourism Council reported that in 2021, tourism generated ₹13.2 lakh crore (US$170 billion), accounting for 5.8% of India’s GDP. And expansion of the scope of this business must project a positive stride in the age of this digital capitalism with improved transmission of information. Yet, there is a lack of knowledge about the different types of content, which are shared in Social Media Platforms in relation to tourism, such as Tourism Managers' Content, Tourist Generated Content, etc.


While exchange of tourist experience is well established within academia, we still feel a scorching need to find out more about them. Over the last decade, User Generated Content platforms such as Face book, Twitter, Instagram etc. have increased exponentially and are today becoming a valuable source of information that enable tourism trends to be analyzed (e.g. Leelawat, 2022). From the perspective of tourists who share their experiences, UCG has been used in a number of marketing and consumer research studies (e.g., Berezina (2016), Garner (2022), Narangajava Kaosiri (2019), Timoshenko (2019), Ballester (2021), etc.).

That is the particular juncture, where this study seeks to bulge in, situating its motivating space one hand from the lack emerging from the prior engagements, and on the other from the new exclusivity of the post-COVID conditions. The motivation of this study is to ascertain through review of literature on the social media (YouTube, Blogs, Google, etc.) and Social Networks (Face book, Google, Linked In, Twitter, etc.) how these platforms influence the consumer purchasing decision across different products. The particular focus of this study is to understand the same for tourism products, i.e., travelling. In this avenue, the paper examines the role of Social media in the marketing strategy through multiple ways, including a revival of the word of mouth (WOM) communications with the consumers. The study, in that sense also opens gateways for understanding how a company can extract benefit from the social media in building a different brand and impact on consumers, as far as tourism industry is concerned. The study according to us emerges as an important intervention in this field, aiming to address the criterion of decision making of consumers while buying tourism products in the three stages of travel planning process using social media. We firmly believe that a rigorous analysis of the same will not only address the academic discursive gaps existing in the prior studies, but would also indicate towards insights regarding macro ideas from the perspectives of companies seeking to design digital marketing strategies and governments seeking to design tourism policies.

The remainder of the paper is structured as follows: section two offers a literature review to present the research gap, theoretical background and the research objectives;

section three is devoted to the methodology and the findings are presented in section four. Section five concludes the paper with a discussion of the findings, followed by conclusions, implications and suggested avenues for future research. 

2. Literature Review

This section seeks to dig deep into the rich scholarly efforts to gauge the impact of social media marketing on purchasing behaviour. The purpose of the chapter is to trace the gaps in these rich discursive engagements, which require further scholarly investigation. Various issues related to social media and Marketing have been identified by scholars and professionals over the past decade. Consumer behaviour, approach to social media sites, and impacts on the marketing industry have been identified vividly by scholars across various spaciotemporal contexts (Chung and Austin, 2010; Hensel and Deis, 2010; Kyle and Michael, 2010; Diffy and Kearns, 2011). One can locate an extensive review of the same in Alves et al. (2016). Our objective in this paper is to focus specifically on the interface between the social media sites and the tourism industry, which has evolved as an important phenomenon in the current conjecture, propelling varied discursive interactions. The role of social media in the tourism industry has been located primarily in two strands, one from the side of the consumers (as in the people who are trying to consume tourism products), and the other from the side of the suppliers (the people who are supplying the tourism products). The literature provides varied responses from both these strands. As far as the side of the consumers are concerned, the literature primarily revolves around the decision-making process of the tour at different junctures, and the effect of social media on it.

The first among them is the role of social media in the decision-making process of the consumer during the pre-trip phase of the consumer’s travel planning process. These studies involve discussions relating to the use and effect of information available on social media in the pre-trip stage. How social media mediates the recognition of the need of a particular travel, or the access to the information regarding a particular travel is the objective of these strands of literature (Burgess, Sellitto, Cox, & Buultjens, 2011; Cox, Burgess, Sellitto, & Buultjens, 2009; Fotis, Buhalis, & Rossides, 2011; Huang, Basu, & Hsu, 2010; Lee, 2011;


Lo, McKercher, Lo, Cheung, & Law, 2011; Papathanassis & Knolle, 2011; Parra-López, Bulchand-Gidumal, Gutiérrez-Taño, & Díaz-Armas, 2011; Sparks & Browning, 2011; Xiang, 2010; Xiang & Gretzel, 2010). The second important strand locates the importance of the social media at the during-trip stage of decision making in the travel process of the consumer, involving studies related to the important attributes in which social media contributes during the trip like evaluation of alternatives during the trip, purchasing decisions during the trip, etc. (Cox, Burgess, Sellitto, & Buultjens, 2009; Fotis, Buhalis, & Rossides, 2011; Lee, 2011; Lee, Xiong, & Hu, 2012; Sparks & Browning, 2011; Tussyadiah, Park, & Fesenmaier, 2011). The final important strand from the consumer’s side deals with the impact of social media on the consumers’ decision making during the post-trip process, in the post-purchase behaviour (Cox, Burgess, Sellitto, & Buultjens, 2009); Fotis, Buhalis, & Rossides, 2011; Huang, Basu, & Hsu, 2010; Lee, 2011; Parra-López, Bulchand-Gidumal, Gutiérrez-Taño, & Díaz-Armas, 2011; Scott & Orlikowski, 2012; Yoo & Gretzel, 2011). All these three phases of consumers’ decision making during travelling and the impact of social media in the same stands of extreme importance for our pursuit in this paper.

However, there also lies another vivid trajectory of literature which seeks to understand the impact of social media on travelling industry through the lens of the supplier of tourism products. The first and foremost important trajectory in this literature strand is that of the role of social media in promotion of products. This strand of literature illustrates the role of social media in ensuring a global dissemination of information and promotional materials through its transnational space, in turn strengthening the marketing forces of the supplier company (Akehurst, 2009; Chan & Denizci Guillet, 2011; Dippelreiter et al., 2008; Fuchs, Scholochov, & Höpken, 2009; Huang, 2011; Huang, Yung, & Yang, 2011; Inversini & Cantoni, 2011; Inversini, Cantoni, & Buhalis, 2009; Kasavana, Nusair, & Teodosic, 2010; Leung, Law, & Lee, 2011; Lew, 2008; Munar, 2010; Pan, MacLaurin, & Crotts, 2007; Schmallegger & Carson, 2008; Wood, 2009). Then comes the studies relating to suppliers’ application of social media for facilitating online bookings and distributing products and services, which illustrate the role of social media in product distribution

(Akehurst, 2009; Chan & Denizci Guillet, 2011; Fuchs, Scholochov, & Höpken, 2009; Noone, McGuire, & Rohlfs, 2011; Schmallegger & Carson, 2008). Social media also aids the suppliers in facilitating an efficient communication channel between the suppliers and consumers, which has been pointed out in the literature (Akehurst, 2009; Chan & Denizci Guillet, 2011) and also the broader arena of management, which elaborates the role of social media in managing training and professional development, financial management, internal communication, and other internal functions like research and development (Akehurst, 2009; Dippelreiter et al., 2008; Fuchs, Scholochov, & Höpken (2009); Huang, 2011; Inversini & Cantoni, 2011; Inversini, Cantoni, & Buhalis, 2009; Isacsson & Gretzel, 2011; Lee & Wicks, 2010; Leung, Law, & Lee, 2011; Li & Wang, 2011).

3. Research Gaps

As we see, the literature on this topic covers dense and diverse areas, but the spatiotemporal context of the studies demands constant re-examinations. Majority of the studies in this domain has evolved over the pre-COVID period and not majorly focused on the Indian conditions. It is our strong conjecture that after the digitalization boom post the pandemic, the conditions for research in the interface of social media and tourism and travel has radically changed. Under such a conjecture, we believe that our dig into the literature chalks out the following gaps which demand immediate addressal:

1. Gap in understanding of the antecedents of the influencing role of the social media in the decision-making process in the context of tourism sector
2. Gap in understanding the consumers’ decision-making process influenced by the social media
3. Absence of any comprehensive model for the influencing role of the social media in the different stages of the decision-making process of the consumers in the context of tourism sector
4. Gap in understanding of the formulation of the communication/promotional strategy in the tourism sector and the transition from traditional marketing communication strategy to social media marketing strategy

The aforementioned gaps open the gateway for the analysis pursued in this paper, which has been detailed in the subsequent sections.


4. Research Objectives

In the present study, an attempt has been made to understand the influence of the social media in the consumer’s decision making process at the three stages, namely, pre-travel, during the travel and post travel, and also the impact of the emerged factors from the three stages of the consumers’ decision making on the consumers’ final travel related decisions.

The objectives of the present research are as follows:

1. To identify the observable variables to define the three stages of decision making process emerged from identified parameters for the development of the theoretical framework
2. To explore the factors that influence the consumer decision making process by the social media at the three stages of the decision making , separately, for the formulation of the social media strategy in the perspective of the tourism sector

5. Development of the Theoretical Framework of the Research

Table 1: Research Streams and Publications of Tourism and Hospitality Studies on Social Media in the consumer related decision making perspectives

Research StreamsDescription
Consumer Decision making process
Pre-trip stage
Role of social media in the pre-trip stage of the travelers’ travel planning process
Studies relating to the use and impact of information on social media in the pre-trip stage (i.e., need recognition, information search) of the travelers’ travel planning process
Consumer Decision making process
During -trip stage
Role of social media in the during-trip stage of the travelers’ travel planning process
Studies relating to the use and impact of information on social media in the during-trip stage (i.e., evaluation of alternatives, purchase decision) of the travelers’ travel planning process
Consumer Decision making process
Post -trip stage
Role of social media in the post-trip stage of the travelers’ travel planning process
Studies relating to the use and impact of information on social media in the post-trip stage (i.e., post-purchase behavior) of the travelers’ travel planning process

Prior to the analysis, a framework with three research streams from the consumers’ perspective were first developed for classifying and analyzing the studies. Litvin, Goldsmith, and Pan (2008) noted that the travelers’ travel planning process would be increasingly influenced by electronic word-of mouth from social media. Hence, the use and determinants of social media in the three phases of the traveler’s travel planning process—which are pre-trip, during-trip and post-trip—were highlighted as the consumer-related research streams.

The present researchers has identified the parameters associated with the consumer decision making process in the three research streams e.g. pre-trip, during the trip and post trip stages.

Table 2: Identification of parameters in the consumer related decision making perspectives

Sl NoParameter CodingDescription of the Parameters
1BP1Credibility of Information Search
2BP2Effective platform for information search
3BP3Convenience of Information Search
4BP4Review of Friends comments
5BP5Review of Strangers comments
6BP6Trustworthiness of Friends
7BP7Level of Interactions with the strangers
8BP8Trustworthiness of the brands
9BP9Positive reviews of Friends induce buying
10BP10Positive Reviews of Strangers induce buying
11BP11Negative Views from friends dissuade Buying
12BP12Negative views from stranger dissuade buying
13BP13Social media becomes more influential than traditional in present day decision making
14BP14Review write up after purchasing the product/ service
15BP15Opinion sharing based on his satisfaction/dissatisfaction

6. Methodology

Design, Sample and Data Collection

The study adopts a combination of exploratory and descriptive research design. A thorough review of literature has helped laying theoretical foundation and building the conceptual model (stated in objective 1), which is in turn empirically tested.

Research Instrument

A questionnaire was administered for primary data collection. The first section of the questionnaire contains the demographic and psychographic information of the respondent.


The demographic information includes gender, educational level, profession and annual income. Today’s lifestyle of consumers are completely based on social media and their intensity of using the social media are becoming influencers of changing attitudes, values and lifestyles. The intensity of using social media is also considered as moderating variables. The psychographic information includes beliefs, values, lifestyle, social status, activities, interests and opinions. In the 2nd section, social media use was measured across three stages of travel, i.e. pre-travel, during travel and post-travel. This was done with the help of 12-item scale in the pre-travel (searching stage), 17-item scale during the decision making process and 7-item scale in the post purchase behavior. In the 3rd section, number of tours already made by the influence of the social media has been captured and the response of this section has been taken as decision box.

Purposive sampling method was used that allowed to tap only those respondents that had travelled in the last two years, were social media users and had used social media in their last travel. These respondents were then requested to answer the questions keeping in mind their last travel.

To gather responses for the study, the research was carried out in two phases. In the first phase, a pilot survey was conducted. For this purpose, a sample of 100 respondents was selected conveniently. The initial sample included those respondents who were willing to participate and devote quality time with the researchers to undergo the interview process. In the second phase, the final data was collected from 300 domestic tourist respondents who were residents of West Bengal visiting within and outside the country.

Therefore, a structured questionnaire was prepared and the survey was conducted in-person, and mostly at the premises where the subjects are employed. Questionnaires were self-administered to the participants; most of which filled and returned them instantly, while others were returned later. It is pertinent to note that before circulation the questionnaire was pretested and modified to ensure validity.

The questionnaire utilized a five-point Likert scale, one point for “Strongly disagree,” two points for “Moderately Disagree,” three points for “Agree,” four points for “Moderately Agree” and five points for “Strongly agree.”

Out of the 371 questionnaires that were distributed a total of 300 usable responses could be retrieved. Therefore, the valid sample size for the study was considered as 300. A pilot survey of 100 respondents was conducted to attain the content validity and also, internal consistency reliability estimates were checked. None of the items were dropped, and the full instrument was carried for final data collection.

Method

Exploratory factor analysis(EFA) was used to extract the factors that characterize the decision making behavior of the consumers’ in the pre-travel, during the travel and post-travel stages. Multiple regression analysis has been performed to find out the relationship of the emerged factors of each of the three stages of decision making with the frequencies of the travelers decision making using social media.

7. Results and Discussion

Theoretical framework was developed considering all the parameters influencing the consumer decision making process in the three stages of travel related decision making and now, EFA is used to identify latent determinants at the Pre-travel Stage, During the Travel and Post Travel Stage. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to identify factors that explain the correlations among a set of variables (Malhotra and Dash, 2011). The EFA was executed on pre-travel stage, during the travel stage and post travel stage.

Pre Travel Stage

The present section pertains to the influence of social media on consumer decision making process in the pre-travel stage. The 12 items used to gauge the influence of social media on decision making in the pre-travel stage were all subjected to EFA using principal components method and Varimax rotation.

Scree plot and Eigen values have been used to confirm the number of factors to be extracted. The four-factor solution explained 71.65% of the total variance of the data set and exhibited a KMO measure of sampling adequacy of 0.707 (Table 3). Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value should be over 0.60 for sample size to be considered adequate for factor analysis (Hutcheson & Sofroniou, 1999). Bartlett’s test (Table 3) investigates the relationship between items of a construct.


If items of a construct are mutually related to each other, then factor analysis can be conducted. The significance level of Chi-square for Bartlett’s test is less than 0.001 - so null hypothesis of no correlation is rejected and factor analysis is applicable in this case (Hutcheson & Sofroniou, 1999). Results from EFA are shown in Table 4.


Table 3: KMO and Bartlett’s test for Pre-travel stage

KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy..707
Bartlett's Test of SphericityApprox. Chi-Square1810.235
df66
Sig..000

Table 4: Summary of Emerged factors, underlying variables and their loading in the pre-travel decision making process

Factor
Name
Factor
Definition
Variable
Description
Variable
in Detail
Factor
Loadings
Consumer attitudes towards Social media[F1]Social medium is increasingly a virtual platform through which consumers’ seek and share informationInterest towards using product and servicesSocial media acts as stimulus0.954
Think about using products and servicesAwareness generated by social media0.919
Think about more information searching for products and servicesAttention creation by social media0.901
Happy to search the informationSearching information in social media becoming a passion0.646
Facilitating Consumers with new travel ideas and growing confidence [F2]Familiarization with the social media use for travel information search and enriching tourist knowledgeExcessive and ever increasing usage of social mediaHabitual user of social media0.766
Increasing trust and beliefs on Social media sitesMore preference to social media than the friends and relatives0.763
Online opinion becoming preferredOnline feedback is preferred over traditional one0.701
Engaging consumers for comparing across brands [F3]The comparative information
enriches tourist knowledge and helps them to reduce the risk involved in travel decision-making
Excessive and ever increasing usage of social mediaWorth full engagement via social media for comparative study0.883
Comparative study to reduce the riskTourist preference for the comparative study0.733
Timely and accurate information,
relevant to visitor
Professional way re-engineering the entire process of developing, managing and marketing tourism products0.591
Trust worthiness and credibility of online consumer reviews[F4]Perceived usefulness of the social media and its perceived ease of useAdaptation of social mediaEncourage consumers to use ICTs in general and social media in particular0.823
Affection towards Social MediaSocial media use of the consumers0.791

Next analysis is the construction of factor matrix based on these four factors. A factor matrix represents the correlations between the variables and thefactors. Table 4 shows the factor loadings corresponding to each observable variable. Factor loadingis basically the correlation coefficient for the variable andfactor.

During the Travel Stage

Here, similar studies have been conducted to find out the factors for during the travel stage. Firstly, KMO and Bartlett’s test, and lastly, factor matrix for the same have been presented to validate the analysis and identify the newly emerged factors.

Table 5: KMO and Bartlett’s test for the during travel stage decision

KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy.0.687
Bartlett's Test of SphericityApprox. Chi-Square2094.402
df136
Sig.0.000

Here, KMO measure of sampling adequacy of 0.687 (Table 5) which is more than 0.60. Hence, the sample size can be considered adequate for factor analysis (Hutcheson & Sofroniou, 1999). Alongwith this, the significance level of Chi-square for Bartlett’s test is less than 0.001 (Table 13), which also satisfies the criterion of factor analysis.


The six-factor solution explained 72.2% of the total variance of the data set. Six emerged factors with their variable components and loadings are stated in the table 6.

Table 6: Summary of Emerged factors, underlying variables and their loading in the during the travel decision making process

Factor
Name
Factor
Definition
Variable
Description
Variable
in Detail
Factor
Loadings
Social media-emerged as an interactive platform [F1]It features a new degree of
interactivity and consumer involvement in advertising applications
Social media acts as commercial medium of advertisingBehavioral responses of the consumers’ toward social media advertising0.913
Regular interactions with the consumersTwo-way (or multi-way) communication in an online
platform
0.879
Social media emerged as effective IMC toolsSocial media characterized by user freedom, control and dialogue.0.830
Social media –An evaluation
platforms for consumer experiences [F2]
the role of social media, enabling customers to talk to one another, is an extension of traditional
word-of- mouth (WOM) communication
Familiarity with social media storiesIn the
new age of social media, he/ she can now potentially influence thousands of
Consumers.
0.927
Tangible touch via social mediaintangible nature of tourism makes pre-purchase trial
impossible
0.896
Preference/ choice BuilderInfluencing peer groups to purchase0.857
Social media –source of making make more reliable
decisions by reducing the uncertainty [F3]
The content reliability is important for the sustained growth of social media as the communication mediaCustomer
relationship management systems developed via social media
Effective marketing tool for developing relationship management system0.907
Accurate and precise informationHelps tourist to reduce the uncertainty in decision making0.881
Shared stories
-the ability to encourage audiences to
visualize the consumption of a product or service
Narrative reasoning
readers possess have
substantial impact on the usage of UGC on
social media
0.743
Self-identification in the stories of Social media [F4]Self -identification while reading the travel stories would also lead to consume the product/ serviceTrustworthiness of e-WoMStory sharing in the social media generates the motivation tp proceed0.849
Effective review processContent analysis and its credibility enhance the use of social media 0.849
UGC on social Media – Evaluating the Best alternatives [F5]UGC on social media
was mainly used at the information search
stage of travel planning in the evaluation of alternatives
Choice from the alternativesVariety of UGC on social media are one of the key determinates of affecting the choices0.804
Perceived
expertise and trustworthiness of UGC [F6]
UGC
has become an important information source for
travelers
Information source, variety and trust of UGCExploring the underlying factors for enhancing the trustworthiness of UGC0.741

Post-Trip Phase

Exploratory factor analysis has also been performed in the third phase to extract the factors. In case of Post-Trip Phase also, KMO & Bartlett’s test and factor matrix have been constructed to understand the emerged factors.

Table 7: KMO and Bartlett’s test for Post-Trip Phase

KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy..687
Bartlett's Test of SphericityApprox. Chi-Square845.964
df21
Sig..000

Table 8: Summary of Emerged factors, underlying variables and their loading in the post- travel stages

Factor
Name
Factor
Definition
Variable
Description
Variable
in Detail
Factor
Loading
Shared evaluating
alternatives and decision criterion in the post purchase stage [F1]
UGC on social media helps audiences gain
information about a place by recognizing coherence
in the story
Enthusiastic of sharing InformationUGC on social media is capable of providing
unprecedentedly up-to-date and diversified formats
of information to travel consumers
0.914
Post Travel Review shareStories
have the ability to encourage audiences to
visualize the consumption of a product or service
0.893
Risk assessment based on post travel review shareUGC on social media is capable of providing
unprecedentedly up-to-date and diversified formats
of information to travel consumers
0.844
Social Media-An Evaluating Platform [F2]Evaluation the information provided by the social media with the tourist experienceCollaborative and Interactive PlatformInterpersonal (e.g. involving one-to-one interaction between people)0.767
Perceived trustworthiness and reliability of UGCNon-marketers who have responsibility for marketing and other aspects of the business0.654

Here, KMO measure of sampling adequacy is 0.687 (Table 7) which is more than 0.60. Hence, the sample size can be considered adequate for factor analysis (Hutcheson & Sofroniou, 1999). Along with this, the significance level of Chi-square for Bartlett’s test is less than 0.001 (Table 16), which also satisfies the criterion of factor analysis. The two-factor solution explained 62.33% of the total variance of the data set. The emerged factors are presented with the loadings of their variable components in the table 8.

8. Discussions

The study aimed to determine the influence of the social media use on the consumers decision making process for travel-related purposes in the three stages of their travel, e.g. pre-travel, during the travel and post travel decision making process. To reach this goal, the study attempted to answer two research questions: “What are the parameters considered in the present body of literatures for the travel-related decision making process? ” and “What are the factors behind the use of social media in the three stages for travel-related purposes?”.

To investigate the first research question, existing literatures were extensively used to identify the parameters influencing the consumer decision making process at the three stages of the travel process and a theoretical framework was developed.

The survey instrument was developed based on the items sorted at the three stages of the travel decision making and the response of the travelers,

who were using social media for their travel decision making for the last five years were collected. The responses of the consumers were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis to extract categorically the influencing factors in the three stages to justify the second research question.

As stated in the literature review, in order to reduce the risk of choices of decision making , travelers typically access and evaluate online travel information early in the decision-making process (Buhalis and Law, 2008; Cox et al., 2009; Fotis et al., 2012; Leung et al., 2013; Pantano and Di Pietro, 2013; O’Connor, 2010; Zeng and Gerritsen, 2014). According to these findings, it is possible to state that social media has become one of the important information sources for tourists to make their travel-related decisions. From the present study it has been revealed that consumer’s attitudes towards social media [F1] and role of social media to facilitate consumers with new travel ideas and growing confidence [F2] has emerged as the significant factors in the pre-travel stage. Consumers also feel that engagements via social media for comparative study across brands are truly worth full and the factor loading of the parameter (0.883) is significantly high. Consistent with the earlier study, Trustworthiness and credibility of online consumer reviews[F4] is critical in consumers’ decision to buy travel related products or take a favorable action toward products advertised on social media.


Consumers’ benefit perceptions of social media for their during the travel stage were expressed as: “their familiarity with social media (factor loading 0.927)”, “helps to make more reliable decisions by reducing the uncertainty through regular interactions (factor loading 0.881)”, “helps them for more appropriate choices by developing relationship management (factor loading -0.907)”, and “provides a platform to share their reviews (factor loading 0.849)”. the emerged factors during the travel decision making process namely, Social media-emerged as an interactive platform [F1], Social media –An evaluation platforms for consumer experiences [F2], Social media –source of making make more reliable decisions by reducing the uncertainty [F3] has established the fact that customers’ belief in the accuracy and dependability of social media sharing is one of the most significant aspects influencing its worth.

Shared evaluating alternatives and decision criterion in the post purchase stage [F1] and social media as an evaluating platform[F2] has emerged as significant factors in the post-travel stage. The findings of the study demonstrated that strong emotions on customer satisfaction lead to social media sharing. This result is in line with the body of research on conventional word-of-mouth (WOM), which claims that consumers frequently start a WOM spreading process because of strong emotions related to a product experience, such happiness or dissatisfaction (Burgess et al., 2009).

9. Conclusions and Practical Implications

According to the literature review, social media is one of the quickly evolving ideas that could affect marketing tactics. Even though social media has become widely used by both suppliers and tourists, practitioners and academics are still mostly unaware of effective social media management and manipulation techniques (Leung et al., 2013; Zheng and Gretzel, 2010). Research addressing the dearth of empirical evidence to characterize and elucidate social media's function in the travel and tourism sector may yield useful recommendations, particularly for practitioners looking to create more effective integrated marketing plans. The present study meets the gap by exploring the significant factors in the three stages of travel making e.g. pre, during the travel and post travel.

The study's conclusions show that social media is widely used by consumers for both everyday and travel-related reasons. Social media is utilized more during the pre-travel phase of a trip when there is a greater chance of influencing customers' purchasing decisions but their experience during the travel and building trustworthiness as well as satisfaction has been reflected in the trvel period and post travel stages respectively. These results highlight social media's significance from the standpoint of tourism marketing. Travel agencies should take social media sharing seriously and view it as an integral component of their integrated marketing campaigns.

Businesses require comprehensive customer data in order to create effective marketing campaigns. Understanding their consumers' behavior choices, concerns, and determinants requires this information. Because social media is a two-way street, through the media, travel agencies can offer tailored information that caters to each visitor's unique requirements and tastes . In order to better understand their clients and create individualized services that cater to their specific demands, tourism businesses should incorporate data from social media into their systems.

The study also has implications for tourism professionals on the connection between social media and satisfaction perception. The findings of the study demonstrated that strong emotions on customer satisfaction lead to social media sharing. Given these results, travel agencies ought to give special consideration to both extremely happy and dissatisfied customers. As part of their complaint handling process, they might encourage their happy customers to post on social media and take seriously any unfavorable social media posts.

This study has shed more light on how consumers utilize social media in relation to travel at three different stages of decision making, which helps to better understand their actions. The study's conclusions might help practitioners and scholars comprehend Web 2.0 technologies and social media and how they affect customers.

Limitations and Future Research

The respondents were chosen solely from the state of West Bengal, and the sample was not chosen at random. The multinational structure of the tourism business means that even if the entire sample comes from a single state,


the results could yield valuable information for the industry globally.

The use of social media in travel is a relatively recent yet significant topic for practitioners and scholars alike. Therefore, research addressing the dearth of empirical data to characterize and elucidate its function in the travel and tourism sector may help close a gap in the body of literature. Due to the topic's cultural components, changes in time and sample characteristics could have an impact on the results. For this reason, future research that uses consumer samples from nations with diverse cultures and historical periods could advance this subject.

Furthermore, more research analyzing the connections between consumer decision-making and social media use in travel may yield useful data for the tourism sector.

References

[1] Akehurst, G. (2009). User generated content: The use of blogs for tourism organisations and tourism consumers. Service Business, 3(1), 51–61.

[2] Ballester, E., Ruiz, C., & Rubio, N. (2021). Engaging consumers through firm-generated content on Instagram. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 25(3), 355-373.

[3] Berezina, K., Bilgihan, A., Cobanoglu, C., & Okumus, F. (2016). Understanding satisfied and dissatisfied hotel customers: Text mining of online hotel reviews. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 25(1), 1-24.

[4] Buhalis, D., & O’Connor, P. (2005). Information communication technology revolutionizing tourism. Tourism Recreation Research, 30(3), 7-16.

[5] Burgess, S., Sellitto, C., Cox, C., & Buultjens, J. (2011). Trust perceptions of online travel information by different content creators: Some social and legal implications. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(2), 221–235.

[6] Chan, N. L., & Denizci Guillet, B. (2011). Investigation of social media marketing: How does the hotel industry in Hong Kongperform in marketing on social media web sites? Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 28(4), 345–368.

[7] Cox, C., Burgess, S., Sellitto, C., & Buultjens, J. (2009). The role of user-generated content in tourists’ travel planning behavior. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 18(8), 743–764.

[8] Dippelreiter, B., Grün, C., Pöttler, M., Seidel, I., & Berger, H. (2008). Online tourism communities on the path to Web 2.0—An evaluation. Information Technology & Tourism, 10(4), 329–353.

[9] Duggan, M., Ellison, N.B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2015). Social media update 2014. Pew Research Center, pp. 9.

[10] Fotis, J., Buhalis, D., & Rossides, N. (2011). Social media impact on holiday travel: The case of the Russia and the FSU markets. International Journal of Online Marketing, 1(4), 1–19.

[11] Fotis, J., Buhalis, D., & Rossides, N. (2012). Social media use and impact during the holiday travel planning process. in Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, Springer-Verlag, Vienna, pp. 13-24.

[12] Fuchs, M., Scholochov, C., & Höpken, W. (2009). E-Business adoption, use, and value creation: An Austrian hotel study. Information Technology & Tourism, 11(4), 267–284.

[13] Gallup. (2014). The myth of social media: a majority of consumers say they are not influencedby Facebook or Twitter. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/sac_report_11_socialmedia_061114.pdf.

[14] Garner, B., Thornton, C., Pawluk, A.L., Mora, R., Johnston, W., & Ayala, C. (2022). Utilizing text mining to explore consumer happiness within tourism destinations. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1366-1377.

[15] Huang, L. (2011). Social media as a new play in a marketing channel strategy: Evidence from Taiwan travel agencies’ blogs. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 17, 615–634. DOI: 10.1080/10941665.2011.635664.

[16] Huang, L., Yung, C. Y., & Yang, E. (2011). How do travel agencies obtain a competitive advantage? Through a travel blog marketing channel. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 17(2), 139–149.


[17] Huang, Y. H., Basu, C., & Hsu, M. K. (2010). Exploring motivations of travel knowledge sharing on social network sites: An empirical investigation of U.S. college students. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 19(7), 717–734.

[18] Hutcheson, G.D., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). Multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. London: SAGE Publications.

[19] Inversini, A., & Cantoni, L. (2011). Towards online content classification in understanding tourism destinations’ information competition and reputation. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 6(3), 282–299.

[20] Inversini, A., Cantoni, L., & Buhalis, D. (2009). Destinations’ information competition and web reputation. Information Technology & Tourism, 11(3), 221–234.

[21] Kasavana, M. L., Nusair, K., & Teodosic, K. (2010). Online social networking: Redefining the human web. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 1(1), 68–82.

[22] Kozinets, R., de Valck, K., Wojinicki, A.C., & Wilner, S. (2010). Networked narratives: understanding word of mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 71-89.

[23] Lee, B. C., & Wicks, B. (2010). Tourism technology training for destination marketing organisations (DMOs): Need-based content development. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 9(1), 39–52.

[24] Lee, S. W. (2011). To tweet or not to tweet: An exploratory study of meeting professionals’ attitudes toward applying social media for meeting sessions. Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, 12(4), 271–289.

[25] Lee, W. J., Xiong, L., & Hu, C. (2012). The effect of Facebook users’ arousal and valence on intention to go to the festival: Applying an extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 819–827.

[26] Leelawat, N., Jariyapongpaiboon, S., Promjun, A., Boonyarak, S., Saengtabtim, K., Laosunthara, A., & Yudha, A.K. (2022). Twitter data sentiment analysis of tourism in Thailand during the COVID19 pandemic using machine learning. Heliyon, 8, e10894.

[27] Leung, D., Lee, H. A., & Law, R. (2011). Adopting Web 2.0 technologies on chain and independent hotel web sites: A case study of hotels in Hong Kong. In R. Law, M. Fuchs, & F. Ricci (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism, pp. 229–240. New York, NY: Springer-Wien.

[28] Leung, D., Law, R., Van Hoof, H., & Buhalis, D. (2013). Social media in tourism and hospitality: A literature review. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 30(1/2), 3-22.

[29] Lew, A. (2008). Long tail tourism: New geographies for marketing niche tourism products. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 25(3–4), 409–419.

[30] Li, X., & Wang, Y. C. (2011). China in the eyes of west ern travelers as represented in travel blogs. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 28(7), 689–719.

[31] Lo, I. S., McKercher, B., Lo, A., Cheung, C., & Law, R. (2011). Tourism and online photography. Tourism Management, 32(4), 725–731.

[32] Malhotra, N.K., & Dash, S. (2011). Marketing research an applied orientation. (6th ed.). Delhi: Pearson Prentice Hall, pp. 170-203.

[33] Munar, A. M. (2010). Tourist-created content: Rethinking destination branding. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 5(3), 291–305.

[34] Narangajavana-Kaosiri, Y., Callarisa-Fiol, L.J., Moliner-Tena, M.A., Rodrıguez-Artola, R.M., & Sanchez-Garcıa, J. (2019). User-generated content sources in social media: A new approach to explore tourist satisfaction. Journal of Travel Research, 58(2), 253-265.

[35] Noone, B. N., McGuire, K. A., & Rohlfs, K. V. (2011). Social media meets hotel revenue manage ment: Opportunities, issues and unanswered questions. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 10(4), 293–305.

[36] Okazaki, S. (2009). The tactical use of mobile marketing: How adolescents’ social networking can best shape brand extensions. Journal of Advertising Research, 49(1), 12-26.


[37] O’Connor, P. (2010). Expert perceptions on the Future on Hotel Electronic Distribution Channels. In P.J. Sheldon, K.W. Wober, & D.R. Fesenmaier (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism 2001. 346–357. New York: Springer Wien.

[38] Pan, B., MacLaurin, T., & Crotts, J. C. (2007). Travel blogs and the implications for destination marketing. Journal of Travel Research, 46(1), 35–45.

[39] Papathanassis, A., & Knolle, F. (2011). Exploring the adoption and processing of online holiday reviews: A grounded theory approach. Tourism Management, 32(2), 215–224.

[40] Pantano, E., & Di Pietro, L. (2013). From e-tourism to f-tourism: Emerging issues from negative tourists’ online reviews. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 4, 211–227.

[41] Parra-López, E., Bulchand-Gidumal, J., Gutiérrez Taño, D., & Díaz-Armas, R. (2011). Intentions to use social media in organizing and taking vacation trips. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 640–654.

[42] Schmallegger, D., & Carson, D. (2008). Blogs in tourism: Changing approaches to information exchange. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 14(2), 99–110.

[43] Scott, S. V., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2012). Reconfiguring relations of accountability: Materialization of social media in the travel sector. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(1), 26–40.

[44] Sparks, B. A., & Browning,V. (2011). The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1310–1323.

[45] Timoshenko, A., & Hauser, J.R. (2019). Identifying customer needs from user-generated content. Marketing Science, 38(1), 1-20.

[46] Tussyadiah, I., Park, S., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of consumer narratives for destination marketing. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 35(1), 64–78.

[47] Wood, C. (2009). The power of social media: From bolt-on to the centre of the universe. Hospitality Review, 11(3), 18–22.

[48] Xiang, Z. (2010). Modeling the persuasive effects of search engine results. Information Technology & Tourism, 12(3), 233–248.

[49] Xiang, Z., & Gretzel, U. (2010). Role of social media in online travel information search. Tourism Management, 31(2), 179–188.

[50] Yoo, K. H., & Gretzel, U. (2011). Influence of personality on travel-related consumer-generated media creation. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 609–621.

[51] Zheng, X., & Gretzel, U. (2010). Role of social media in online travel information search. Tourism Management, 31(2), 179-188.

[52] Zeng, B., & Gerritsen, R. (2014). What do we know about social media in tourism? A review. Tourism Management Perspectives, 10, 27-36.

[1] By ‘culture’, we mean production of meanings.

Disclaimer / Publisher's Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of Journals and/or the editor(s). Journals and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.