Degree of Consumer Ethnocentrism towards the Domestic and Foreign-Made Health Supplements (The Case of Ludhiana Market)

Authors

  • Shilpa Thakur Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Punjab College of Technical Education, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
  • Kawalpreet Sharma Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Punjab College of Technical Education, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
  • Muskan Manchanda Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Punjab College of Technical Education, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15600981

Keywords:

Consumer Ethnocentrism, International Business, Buying Behaviour, Country of Origin Effect, Health Supplements Market, Ludhiana Market, Product-Specific Approach

Abstract

Customer ethnocentrism continues to be a major issue in worldwide business and marketing, influencing customer behavior even in the face of expanding global consumer cosmopolitanism. Ethnocentrism, the belief in the superiority of one's own group, manifests itself in the marketplace when consumers perceive goods made overseas as improper, unethical, or detrimental to domestic industry. This study examines how consumer ethnocentrism influences purchasing decisions since direct consumption of health supplements suggests a higher perceived physical danger. Since ethnocentric sentiments vary depending on the product category and geographic area, a product- and region-specific approach is required. The Ludhiana market, representative of a South-East Asian transition economy, is the subject of this study in order to investigate consumer attitudes toward both imported and indigenous health supplements. The findings aim to shed light on the relationship between customer ethnocentrism and product perception, which will assist policymakers and businesses better understand purchasing trends in similar economies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baek, H., Ahn, J., & Choi, Y. (2012). Helpfulness of online consumer reviews: Readers' objectives and review cues. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(2), 99-126.

Banerjee, S., Bhattacharyya, S., & Bose, I. (2017). Whose online reviews to trust? Understanding reviewer trustworthiness and its impact on business. Decision Support Systems, 96, 17-26. Berger, J. (2016). Contagious: Why things catch on. Simon and Schuster.

Bhāle, S., & Tongare, K. (2018). A conceptual model of helpfulness of online reviews in a blink. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(2), 7-22.

Burtch, G., Hong, Y., Bapna, R., & Griskevicius, V. (2018). Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Science, 64(5), 2065-2082.

Cantallops, A. S., & Salvi, F. (2014). New consumer behavior: A review of research on eWOM and hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 41-51.

Cao, Q., Duan, W., & Gan, Q. (2011). Exploring determinants of voting for the “helpfulness” of online user reviews: A text mining approach. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 511-521.

Chen, P. Y., Dhanasobhon, S., & Smith, M. D. (2008). All reviews are not created equal: The disaggregate impact of reviews and reviewers at amazon.com.

Chen, L., Jiang, T., Li, W., Geng, S., & Hussain, S. (2017). Who should pay for online reviews? Design of an online user feedback mechanism. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 23, 38-44.

Cheng, Y. H., & Ho, H. Y. (2015). Social influence's impact on reader perceptions of online reviews. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 883-887.

Sparks, B. A., & Browning, V. (2011). The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1310-1323.

Steward, M. D., Narus, J. A., & Roehm, M. L. (2018). An exploratory study of business-to-business online customer reviews: External online professional communities and internal vendor scorecards. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 173-189.

Stouthuysen, K., Teunis, I., Reusen, E., & Slabbinck, H. (2018). Initial trust and intentions to buy: The effect of vendor-specific guarantees, customer reviews and the role of online shopping experience☆. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 27, 23-38.

Tan, H., Lv, X., Liu, X., & Gursoy, D. (2018). Evaluation nudge: Effect of evaluation mode of online customer reviews on consumers’ preferences. Tourism Management, 65, 29-4

Bhāle, S., & Tongare, K. (2018). A conceptual model of helpfulness of online reviews in a blink. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(2), 7-22.

Treisman, A. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76(3), 282-299. DOI: 10.1037/h0027242.

Wang, Y., Lu, X., & Tan, Y. (2018). Impact of product attributes on customer satisfaction: An analysis of online reviews for washing machines. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 29, 1-11.

Xia, L., & Bechwati, N. N. (2008). Word of mouse: the role of cognitive personalization in online consumer reviews. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 9(1), 3-13.

Xie, H., Miao, L., Kuo, P., & Lee, B. (2011). Consumers’ responses to ambivalent online hotel reviews: The role of perceived source credibility and pre-decisional disposition. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(1), 178-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.04.008.

Yin, D., Bond, S., & Zhang, H. (2013). Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 539-560.

Zhang, J., Craciun, G., & Shin, D. (2010). When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1336-1341.

Zhang, Y., & Lin, Z. (2018). Predicting the helpfulness of online product reviews: A multilingual approach. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 27, 1- 10.

Zhuang, M., Cui, G., & Peng, L. (2018). Manufactured opinions: The effect of manipulating online product reviews. Journal of Business Research, 87, 24-35.

Zhang, Z., Liang, S., Li, H., & Zhang, Z. (2019). Booking now or later: Do online peer reviews matter?. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 147- 158.

Xia, L., & Bechwati, N. N. (2008). Word of mouse: the role of cognitive personalization in online consumer reviews. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 9(1), 3-13.

Xie, H., Miao, L., Kuo, P., & Lee, B. (2011). Consumers’ responses to ambivalent online hotel reviews: The role of perceived source credibility and pre-decisional disposition.

Published

2025-04-26
CITATION
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15600981
Published: 2025-04-26

How to Cite

Thakur, S., Sharma, K., & Manchanda, M. (2025). Degree of Consumer Ethnocentrism towards the Domestic and Foreign-Made Health Supplements (The Case of Ludhiana Market). International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 15(2), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15600981

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.