Gendered Inequalities in Higher Education: Structural Barriers, Career Trajectories, and Institutional Practices in Uttarakhand

Authors

  • Sonika Chaudhary Research Scholar, Faculty of Management Studies, Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India
  • Amit Joshi Professor and Dean, Faculty of Management Studies, Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31033/IJEMR/16.5.2026.1953

Keywords:

Gender Inequality, Higher Education, Glass Ceiling, Gender Parity, Institutional Practices

Abstract

Gender equality in higher education is increasingly measured through women's access and participation; however, numerical expansion does not necessarily imply equality in educational progression, academic employment, career advancement or institutional leadership. This study examines gendered inequalities in higher education in Uttarakhand through a longitudinal secondary-data framework. The study integrates evidence from the All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE), Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), NITI Aayog reports and relevant policy and institutional documents. The analysis focuses on five interconnected dimensions: participation, disciplinary distribution, academic progression, faculty representation and career advancement. Particular attention is given to the transition from educational participation to academic employment and senior academic positions. The findings indicate a complex pattern. Uttarakhand has comparatively strong female participation in higher education: in 2021–22, female enrolment in universities and colleges was approximately 2.82 lakh compared with 2.86 lakh male enrolments, producing a near-balanced gender distribution. The state's higher-education Gender Parity Index was approximately 1.09, above the national value of 1.01. However, gender parity in student participation does not automatically translate into parity among academic staff. In 2021–22, women constituted approximately 40.0% of the state's reported higher-education teachers, while their representation fell to approximately 26.2% among professors and 35.3% among associate professors. The study therefore identifies a transition from access equality to career inequality, suggesting the presence of a gendered academic pipeline in which disparities become more visible at higher career levels. The paper argues that gender-responsive higher-education policy in Uttarakhand needs to move beyond enrolment targets towards institutional accountability, career progression, mentoring, research support, childcare, transparent promotion systems and leadership development. The study contributes a state-specific analytical framework for understanding gender inequality as a cumulative institutional process rather than a single participation gap.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002

Acker, S., & Armenti, C. (2004). Sleepless in academia. Gender and Education, 16(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954025032000170309

Agrawal, T. (2021). Gender segregation and wage differentials in India: The role of educational attainment and occupational choices. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-10-2019-0466

Amirtham, S. N., & Kumar, A. (2023). The underrepresentation of women in STEM disciplines in India: A secondary analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 45(12), 1008–1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2179901

Bal, V. (2004). Women scientists in India: Nowhere near the glass ceiling. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(32), 3647–3652.

Banker, D. V. (2023). Status of women leadership in the Indian higher education sector. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(3), 662–680. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2022-0216

Bansal, S., Viswanathan, B., & Meenakshi, J. V. (2023). Does research performance explain the “leaky pipeline” in Indian academia? A study of agricultural and applied economics. Agricultural Economics, 54(2), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12744

Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Columbia University Press.

Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072

Chanana, K. (2003). Visibility, gender, and the careers of women faculty in an Indian university. McGill Journal of Education, 38(3), 381–390.

Dhal, S., & Sharma, J. (2024). Making sense of the gendered realities in science: An exploration of the Indian situation. Social Change, 54(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/00490857231221203

Gandhi, M., & Sen, K. (2021). Missing women in Indian university leadership: Barriers and facilitators. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(2), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219896048

Gupta, N., & Sharma, A. K. (2002). Women academic scientists in India. Social Studies of Science, 32(5–6), 901–915. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631270203200505

Khanna, G., & Mukherjee, M. (2024). Intersectionality and women academics in Indian higher education. Journal of Underrepresented & Minority Progress, 8(Special Issue), 176–203. https://doi.org/10.32674/44yesy16

Kumara, A., & Sahoo, S. (2023). Caste, gender, and intersectionality in stream choice: Evidence from higher secondary education in India. Education Economics, 32(1), 20–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2023.2170983

Kumar, N. (2001). Gender and stratification in science: An empirical study in the Indian setting. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 8(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/097152150100800103

Mayya, S. S., Martis, M., Ashok, L., & Monteiro, A. D. (2021). Women in higher education: Are they ready to take up administrative positions? A mixed-methods approach to identify the barriers, perceptions, and expectations. SAGE Open, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020983272

Ministry of Education, Government of India. (2024). All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) 2021–22. Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education, Government of India.

Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. (2023). Women and men in India 2023. Government of India.

Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. (2023). Annual report, Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), 2021–22. Government of India.

Muralidhar, S., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2024). Women’s representation in Indian academia and conferences. Communications Biology, 7, Article 389. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06058-z

Mukhopadhyay, U. (2023). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on academic performance and work–life balance of women academicians. Asian Journal of Social Science, 51(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajss.2022.07.003

Nelson, M. M., & Agarwal, B. (2023). The rigmarole of negotiating double binds: A qualitative study of Indian women academics’ work-from-home routines in COVID-19 times. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779231209374

Ologeh, I., Mandal, K., & Kshitij, A. (2022). Assessment of gender parity in faculty employment at higher education institutions in India. Journal of Education and Practice, 13(13), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/13-13-03

Sahoo, S., & Klasen, S. (2021). Gender segregation in education: Evidence from higher secondary stream choice in India. Demography, 58(3), 987–1010. https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-9101042

van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Slaying the seven-headed dragon: The quest for gender change in academia. Gender, Work & Organization, 19(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00566.x

Varghese, N. V., & Sabharwal, N. (Eds.). (2024). India higher education report 2022: Women in higher education. Routledge.

Waylen, G. (2014). Informal institutions, institutional change, and gender equality. Political Research Quarterly, 67(1), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913510360

UNESCO. (2021). Women in higher education: Has the female advantage put an end to gender inequalities? UNESCO International Institute for Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Published

2026-10-21
CITATION
DOI: 10.31033/IJEMR/16.5.2026.1953
Published: 2026-10-21

How to Cite

Chaudhary, S., & Joshi, A. (2026). Gendered Inequalities in Higher Education: Structural Barriers, Career Trajectories, and Institutional Practices in Uttarakhand. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 16(5), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.31033/IJEMR/16.5.2026.1953